The research sites on the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s that my US Women's History students have created as part of our project to re-create the Mary Washington college classroom experience are now up on the course site.
Please check the sites out, and vote for the site that you think provides the best set of resources for our class to actually re-create the classroom experience.
Thanks!
Friday, March 16, 2012
Friday, February 03, 2012
What do we call that "digital" thing that we want to teach?
I've been wrestling with the notion of an interdisciplinary academic program for undergraduates that engages students in thoughtful consumption of digital media, in production of scholarly and creative work in various forms of digital media, and in exploration and analysis of the implications of such media. In trying to clarify my thoughts before I go talk to people about this idea at my school and elsewhere, I asked for help on Twitter. The following is the conversation that emerged. I'm still analyzing it--I'm clearly still stuck, for example, in my quest to find a term that captures much of what I like about "Digital Humanities", while including the social sciences and sciences as well--but I thought it might be useful to have the whole thing in one place for me and for anyone else who is interested. I'd welcome any other comments or contributions to the discussion.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The Assignment for Recreating the historical MWC Classroom
As I discussed in this post, my US Women's History since 1870 class will be working on a project in which the ultimate goal is to be able to recreate a class session or two from the middle of the 20th Century.
Here is the assignment that I developed for the course, in three stages. Note the use of individual and group work, online and IRL activities, and deep research in the archives of the school.
As always, I'd appreciate any comments or suggestions. [The full course syllabus is here.]
Here is the assignment that I developed for the course, in three stages. Note the use of individual and group work, online and IRL activities, and deep research in the archives of the school.
As always, I'd appreciate any comments or suggestions. [The full course syllabus is here.]
MARY WASHINGTON CLASSROOM EXPERIENCE RESEARCH PROJECT
This project will be based around researching Mary Washington College classes in the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, & 1960s (including course topics, pedagogical approaches, majors, gender stereotypes, technology, and clothing). As our class lectures and readings look at the experiences of women in the United States in the late 19th and 20th Centuries, our parallel goal will be to understand what college meant to women who came to Mary Washington in the four decades in the middle of the 20th Century.
Each group of 6-7 of you will have a decade to research, using a variety of online and archival sources, as well as interviews with alums from these decades. Rather than writing a traditional individual research paper, you’ll keep a research blog and work with your group to create a research site collecting together the information that you’ve found.
Primary source resources (many available in UMW Special Collections)
- The Bullet
- Course Catalogs
- Academic Department and Faculty Files
- Student Handbooks
- Photographs (Centennial Collection online plus those digitized, but not online yet)
- Alumni/Faculty Interviews (talk to me about interview waivers)
- Resources from Historic Preservation (?)
- Scrapbooks/Aubade/Alumni Magazine/President’s files
Secondary Sources
- Crawley, William B. University of Mary Washington: A Centennial History, 1908-2008. Fredericksburg, VA: University of Mary Washington, 2008.
- Key UMW faculty and staff (Parsons, McClusky, Thaden, Snyder)
Decade-based Research Groups
I will assign each of you to a group of 5-7 each with a different decade at MWC to research, using a variety of online and archival sources, as well as interviews with alums from these decades. Each person will keep their own research log/blog and work with their group to create a research site collecting together the information that you’ve found.
Part I — Individual Research Logs
Each student will take a particular set of primary sources (or will interview alumni) and research classroom experiences for their group’s decade. Each student will share her/his work in progress in the form of four individual research log-style blog posts posted before class starts on four consecutive Tuesdays (1/31, 2/7, 2/14, 2/21).
Part II — Group Research Project
Building on the research done by each of the group members, each group will construct a site for their decade in UMWBlogs. The design, format, and presentation of these sites will be determined by the group, with a broad audience in mind. These sites are due by 11:59 PM on Monday, March 12.
Grading for Parts I and II – 30% overall, with an individual grade for research logs and group grade for the research project.
Part III – Class re-creation
Based on those group research sites, we will collectively decide (with the help of some alums), which decade we will then use for the final project, a re-creation of a course session or two from that decade. The form these class sessions will take is still yet to be determined (depending in part on the decade picked), but they will involve everyone in some way in preparation and presentation. Specific tasks will be determined after the decade is chosen. This recreation will take place during the week of April 17.
Grading for Part III – 10%, with individual grades defined by student’s participation in the re-creation process.
PLEASE NOTE: Throughout these projects, all ideas, phrases, and quotes must be cited using footnote-style citations and bibliographies done using the Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition) or Turabian’s newest Guide (7th Edition).
Labels:
archives,
class,
collaboration,
Digital History,
gender,
higher education,
history,
Pedagogy,
public history,
students,
syllabus,
UMW,
women
Monday, December 19, 2011
Re-Creating the College Classroom of the Past
I just sent the following email to one of my classes for the Spring.
I'm very excited about this project, so any suggestions you have for the process, the approach, the research sites, or anything else will be greatly appreciated.
Hello all,
Thanks for signing up for History 328: US Women’s History since 1870. I wanted to give you a little preview of my plans for our class next semester because the research projects in the class are going to be a little different than that of other history classes (even for those of you who took HIST 327 this fall).
First of all, in many ways, the general structure of the class is going to be fairly standard. We’ll have lectures on Tuesdays and part of Thursdays, and discuss readings on Thursdays. There will be a mid-term and a final based on those lectures, discussions, and readings.
What’s different is that the rest of your grade, roughly 40%, will be based on a series of projects we’ll be working on in groups and as a class. These projects will be based around researching Mary Washington College classes in the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, & 1960s (including course topics, pedagogical approaches, majors, gender stereotypes, technology, and clothing). As the class lectures and readings look at the experiences of women in the United States in the late 19th and 20th Centuries, our parallel goal will be to understand what college meant to women who came to Mary Washington in the four decades in the middle of the 20th Century.
Each group of 6-7 of you will have a decade to research, using a variety of online and archival sources, as well as interviews with alums from these decades. Rather than writing a traditional individual research paper, you’ll keep a research blog and work with your group to create a research site collecting together the information that you’ve found.
Based on those sites, we will collectively decide (perhaps with the help of some alums), which decade we will then use for the final project, a re-creation of a course session or two from that decade.
Now, if this project is not the kind of thing you’ll be interested in working on, you may want to look for another class. But I hope you’ll each at least be intrigued by the idea and perhaps even excited by doing something that is original, fun, and creative, while tying in to the themes we’ll be discussing more broadly for US women in the class.
Have a terrific break and I’ll see you in January.
Dr. McClurken
I'm very excited about this project, so any suggestions you have for the process, the approach, the research sites, or anything else will be greatly appreciated.
Labels:
class,
Digital History,
gender,
higher education,
history,
interview,
Pedagogy,
Real_School,
teaching,
UMW,
women
Tuesday, December 06, 2011
Fall 2011 -- A new building, a new classroom, a new course
[Picture created using the iPhone app from Microsoft, Photosynth]
The class was the History of the Information Age, the building was Monroe Hall, and the classroom is our new flexible space classroom. Look for a post on the latter coming in the next couple weeks.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Info Age #4 -- The Documentaries
[Be sure to check out the earlier installments of my discussion of my History of the Information Age senior seminar as well: here, here, and here, as well as the class timeline and the list of the first set of projects to be placed in that timeline.]
Assignment #4 in this course was the group documentaries on some aspect of the Information Age. I didn't give the students a great deal of direction, other than to say that they needed to show change over time, that they should be between 5 and 10 minutes, and that they needed to upload them somewhere where they could be seen (they all chose YouTube). They had about three weeks to come up with a topic (related to the class discussions of the digital age), research, film, and edit the video.
Each group had a basic video camera, and they had access to the editing stations in our Digital Media Lab (with iMovie and Premiere). Ultimately, only one group used Premiere, one used iMovie, and two used Windows Movie Maker. Although they had been given a brief intro to video editing at the start of the semester by DTLT, most of them were going to be doing video capture and editing for the first time. I recommended that they test out their cameras, video files, and basic editing before they got too far into the process so that they could figure out problems in advance.
They presented the documentaries to the class and they were a great deal of fun. Certainly, the videos aren't as polished as they would have been if I had spent more time in training them how to use editing software, or if they'd had more time in the semester to work on them (both points the students make in their after-project posts, linked below), but I'm quite impressed with the work they produced and their willingness to throw themselves into the projects.
Assignment #4 in this course was the group documentaries on some aspect of the Information Age. I didn't give the students a great deal of direction, other than to say that they needed to show change over time, that they should be between 5 and 10 minutes, and that they needed to upload them somewhere where they could be seen (they all chose YouTube). They had about three weeks to come up with a topic (related to the class discussions of the digital age), research, film, and edit the video.
Each group had a basic video camera, and they had access to the editing stations in our Digital Media Lab (with iMovie and Premiere). Ultimately, only one group used Premiere, one used iMovie, and two used Windows Movie Maker. Although they had been given a brief intro to video editing at the start of the semester by DTLT, most of them were going to be doing video capture and editing for the first time. I recommended that they test out their cameras, video files, and basic editing before they got too far into the process so that they could figure out problems in advance.
They presented the documentaries to the class and they were a great deal of fun. Certainly, the videos aren't as polished as they would have been if I had spent more time in training them how to use editing software, or if they'd had more time in the semester to work on them (both points the students make in their after-project posts, linked below), but I'm quite impressed with the work they produced and their willingness to throw themselves into the projects.
- Group 1 – How the rise of modern forms of transmitting information have affected the U.S. Postal Service
- Group 2 – Tutorials Through Time
- Group 3 – Shift from card catalogs to digital catalogs in libraries, with a focus on its effect on librarians
- Group 4 – Documentary on the history of the internet and its effect on Higher Education, using the University of Mary Washington as a contextual lens
What's your take? What suggestions do you have for future iterations of the assignment?
Labels:
class,
collaboration,
digital publishing,
documentary,
Information Age,
Pedagogy,
Real_School,
teaching,
UMW
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Info Age Assignment # 3 -- The advertisements
[Though I still need to go back and blog about the first two assignments in my History of the Information Age senior seminar (the creation of our class timeline and the first set of projects to be placed in that timeline), I decided to go ahead and post about this assignment anyway.]
For this assignment, the class split into four groups, each to work on their own fictional advertisement. The goal of this assignment was to have students explore what went into advertisements in the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, and/or 1960s. We read several pieces on the history of advertising as part of our weekly class reading on the history of communication and information, and students did further research before they actually created their projects. [Some of the ads juxtapose topics that are chronologically out of the time period of the ad style, but I think that actually helped, in that it forced students to do more than just copy previous advertisements.]
Students threw themselves into researching the way that advertising was done in terms of themes, colors, wording, images, stories, tone, even font. And at the end I think that they learned quite a bit about the difficulty and possibility of communicating in ways that go beyond text itself.
Check them out and let us know what you think.
For this assignment, the class split into four groups, each to work on their own fictional advertisement. The goal of this assignment was to have students explore what went into advertisements in the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, and/or 1960s. We read several pieces on the history of advertising as part of our weekly class reading on the history of communication and information, and students did further research before they actually created their projects. [Some of the ads juxtapose topics that are chronologically out of the time period of the ad style, but I think that actually helped, in that it forced students to do more than just copy previous advertisements.]
Students threw themselves into researching the way that advertising was done in terms of themes, colors, wording, images, stories, tone, even font. And at the end I think that they learned quite a bit about the difficulty and possibility of communicating in ways that go beyond text itself.
Check them out and let us know what you think.
- Tupperware Print Ad -- http://infoage.umwblogs.org/2011/10/24/post-war-woman-and-the-spread-of-information/
- Weight-gain Print Ad -- http://infoage.umwblogs.org/2011/10/24/gain-flesh-gain-the-girl/
- Further explanation of the group's research and approach, some technical discussion, and photo issues.
- Wurlitzer Jukebox meets the Hipster Print Ad -- http://infoage.umwblogs.org/2011/10/23/advertisement-project-the-wurlitzer-jukebox/
- Discussion of advertising research
- Gutenberg Press Radio Ad -- http://infoage.umwblogs.org/2011/10/23/radio-advertisement/
- Sources used
- Further explanation of the group's research and approach.
Labels:
collaboration,
Digital History,
Information Age,
Pedagogy,
students,
teaching,
UMW
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)